|
|
|
INTIMACY |
|
Moving On From
Melodrama
Posted August 18th, 2007 by livingbyintent Dear Miriam, Dear Kelly, Why would some women continuously get themselves into relationships that don't bring anything but pain? Why are some of us habitual drama-seekers, consciously or unconsciously creating melodramatic experiences that are so plainly detrimental to our lives? Yes, it feels awful... but, it's never dull. Let's consider the nature of these dramatic experiences. First of all, many real life experiences are painfully dramatic: Illness Accidents Loss of employment Divorce Many other experiences are joyfully dramatic: Major professional achievements The birth of a child Weddings All of these contain heightened emotions and feelings of increased aliveness. Unlike these dramatic events of our lives, the kind of drama we concern ourselves with here are MELODRAMATIC. The best example of melodrama out there is soap operas: exaggerated reactions, constant crisis, excessive emotions, constant frustration, and thrill. Some dramas, whether deliberately or unconsciously created, are extreme and self-destructive, while others are more subtle. The cumulative effects of either are equally destructive. One of the most tragic aspects of dramatic living is that we are often unconscious of our part in creating it. It feels that our troubles and problems are out of control. We find ourselves as the helpless victim. If you suspect that living in drama is part of your life, you would probably like to know the origin of all of this drama. First, we must understand that the drive to seek various novel and complex sensations, emotions, and experiences through reasonable risk is healthy. However, for cultural reasons, many of us (especially women) learn to get involved in particular destructive "thrill" - a self-defeating drama that exhausts our energy, decreases our self-esteem and personal power, and keeps us disconnected from our deepest feelings. Instead of dealing with the pain that lays at the root of our poor self-concept, or our current life situations (deteriorating intimacy, unfulfilling relationships, meaningless jobs, etc.), we create melodrama, which conceals any possible insight. Not only this, but one of the most damaging consequences of this drama is that the conflicts and crisis prevent us from lasting intimacy in relationships. So the problem is two-fold! Another issue, the gradual decline in self-concept, affects all areas of our lives, including our careers. In a nutshell, a life of drama is painful and self-defeating. It brings us excitement, but eventually leads to a greater agony. Do we have to choose? Does life have to be "good, but boring" OR "bad, but exciting"? Not at all. To reiterate, we all have needs for excitement. The question is: can we have it in a way that increases our self-esteem, leads to empowerment and self-actualization? When we learn to transform drama into healthy excitement, our whole image changes; our energy will increase, our self-concept and personal power will be strengthened, our 'care' feelings will be accessible, the intimacy in our relationships will have space to develop. You're probably asking, "how do I get that?" As usual, you probably already know the main steps: take responsibility for your life and actions, learn about your past and own it, forgive yourself and everyone else in your life, regardless of whether or not they deserve it, live in the moment, be aware and be grateful that you're here! Love, |
|
The Contemporary Dance of Intimacy: New Rules For New Roles
Dear Miriam, Gloria (39 years old, 2nd time and still questions!)
Dear Gloria, Once upon a time, even not so long ago, magical words "I love you. Will you marry me?" gave the hope that from that moment on life would never be lonely anymore, and we would be complete - our longing for "happily ever after" would be satisfied. As all of us know, now that "happy ever-after" did not really fulfill its promise. (If you have any doubts, ask yourself "Is (or was) my mother a happy person?") It is clear now that both husbands and wives, felt often that they made a bad bargain. Men were feeling overwhelmed with notions of "men's responsibilities" of sole provider, especially in the case when his accomplishments are supposed to do for two (because she was expected to give up her needs for "direct" impact on the world and live "through him: and children). The result was feelings of anger and resentment, acted out by men in hostile withdrawals, escape into work, TV, sports and drinking. From women's point of view, dreams turn into nightmares rather quick. Many women could not give their needs for fulfillment away completely: wives rebellion took the form of nagging, over controlling, smothering, and of depression. The “new dream," though not a simple one, not even clearly understood by most of us who are daring to live it (because changes generally come before consciousness fully integrates them), is a dream of mature, equal, intimate partnership with our "significant other" (vs. "intimate strangers" situation that was characteristic for marriages of our parents). Let us consider what is involved in this "new reality" of heterosexual intimate partnership that we commonly refer to as "marriage." Many years ago Sigmund Freud pointed out on Love and Work as two major areas of human life. These two require mutual resolution if our life is to be a meaningful one. It is true now as it was then. However, "the resolution" has a different quality because the new roles in marriage as a partnership require new rules. Work is no more an arena for men only - partly by economic necessities, partly by women choices. Love is not solely women's territory anymore (intrigued? think about men support groups, men resource centers, men claiming, (actively!) their fatherhood, etc.) It was Dr. Sullivan, American psychiatrist and psychologist, who defined intimacy as a special kind of relationship based on reciprocity, trust and equality. Trust based on reciprocity may be the result of love for an equal human. This kind of trust, is a result of loving an equal human as much as oneself. In other words, we can not talk about mature intimate, partnership in marriage until we have relatively actualized partners with equal power in the decision making process (which in our culture implies equal or close to it financial power). And it needs to be acknowledged that women’s voice in the market place has been heard for the last 20-25 years (only!!). In order for marriage to succeed (to turn from "intimate strangers" coexistence into intimate partnership) partners eventually have to examine themselves, and come to an understanding that in equality between sexes, cultural gender stereotyping and mutual unmet needs projecting are the boundaries defining their "dance of intimacy". In our culture, that tends to produce oppressed women and repressed men, it is so convenient to nod our heads in agreement with the common sense wisdom; women want intimacy and men resist it; men want sex, and women are willing to give it in exchange for intimacy. But, is it that simple? How couples "dance", how they resolve the intimacy conflicts, depends on the ability of partners to tolerate closeness and distance (which in turn reflect their gender socialization movement between separation and unity with their primary caregiver, most probably mother (what is new here?? and unmet projections). To improve the "dance of intimacy" we need the knowledge the conscious understanding of new roles and new rules in modern marriage. Without this knowledge we live in illusion, which turns to hopeless despair. With the knowledge and understanding, we find ourselves being people in process: men and women growing together, coming to incorporate new meaning in the intimate partnership of equals, partners discovering the meaning of marriage. Love and blessings, Miriam |